Site Logo
Business

SCOTUS Voids IEEPA Tariffs; Trump Enacts New 15% Global Surcharge

Jessica ChenJessica Chen
Share:
SCOTUS Voids IEEPA Tariffs; Trump Enacts New 15% Global Surcharge

The Supreme Court struck down the 'Liberation Day' tariffs, leading to a swift response from the administration. This article details the 24-hour period that resulted in a new 15% tariff, examining the legal justification and potential challenges.

A Supreme Court ruling against the administration's tariffs led to a quick response, with a new 15% tariff will be implemented on Tuesday, Feb 24, 2026.

Supreme Court Ruling

On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court struck down the "Liberation Day" tariffs in a 6-3 decision. The court found that the president lacked the authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose the tariffs. The tariffs included a 10% tariff on all imports and other country-specific measures.

The court applied the "major questions" doctrine, with the majority arguing that IEEPA did not clearly delegate Congress's power over tariffs. Dissenting justices argued that IEEPA does permit tariffs as a tool to regulate imports.

The administration justified the new measure by citing "large and serious balance-of-payments deficits" and the need to address fundamental international payment problems. This 15% tariff is a temporary action under Section 122, which expires after 150 days unless extended by an act of Congress.

Advertisement

Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows temporary tariffs or quotas to address balance-of-payments deficits. This differs from IEEPA, which is based on broader emergency powers. Experts note that Section 122 offers less flexibility and requires specific findings. The administration is reportedly planning Section 301 investigations for longer-term tariffs after the 150-day period.

Impact

Importers and businesses face immediate 15% duties beginning Tuesday. They may pursue refunds from the previous IEEPA tariffs. These costs could potentially be passed on to consumers.

Legal challenges may arise due to Section 122's time limit and procedural requirements for alternatives. Importers could challenge the new tariffs, though Section 122 has faced fewer court tests than other trade measures. The situation remains fluid, with potential implications for businesses and consumers in Western North Carolina.

Comments (0)

Leave a comment

Log in to show your avatar and username with your comment.

By posting, you agree to our Comment Policy.