Residents of Western North Carolina, particularly in Asheville and Buncombe County, are facing disruptions due to stalled infrastructure projects. A dispute over FEMA funding is causing delays, raising concerns about safety and economic development in the region.
Funding Dispute
A legal conflict between North Carolina and FEMA over $200 million in Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program funds is impacting critical infrastructure projects. These projects include flood mitigation, water and sewer upgrades, and stormwater systems. The delays stem from FEMA's non-compliance with a court order to reinstate North Carolina's BRIC participation.
North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson filed a motion in federal court to enforce a previous ruling that found FEMA in violation of the law for canceling the state's BRIC participation. Despite the court order, FEMA has not resumed funding or project approvals.
Impact on the Community
Local governments in Western North Carolina have begun planning and engineering for some projects designed to protect against floods and storms. However, the funds remain frozen, hindering progress. The BRIC program supports pre-disaster resilience measures, which are vital for areas frequently affected by heavy rain and flooding.
The delays are also affecting recovery efforts from past events, such as Hurricane Helene. Slow disbursement of recovery funding and unapproved hazard mitigation applications are adding to the challenges faced by the community.
Stakeholders
The situation involves several key players. North Carolina officials, led by Attorney General Jeff Jackson, are actively working to enforce the court order. FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) are under scrutiny for not resuming funding and for bureaucratic delays. Recovery leaders, including Gov. Josh Stein's GROW NC office, are reporting ongoing issues with FEMA reimbursements.
Looking Ahead
The delays heighten safety risks from potential floods and storms and hinder economic recovery by blocking reimbursements needed for growth. State officials are planning advocacy efforts to secure more federal funds. The community awaits resolution to resume critical infrastructure projects.

